2021

Interaction Design

.

Design System

.

User Research

.

Growth Testing

Scaling donations through growth experiments

Givingloop is a fundraising software startup for non-profit organizations. I led the UX efforts to redesign the web-responsive donation experience, focusing on driving growth through two-week sprint cycles of experimentation. Collaborating closely with engineers, the product manager, and the CEO. These growth experiments led to a 6% increase in monthly donations and a 12% increase in users covering their fees, significantly boosting key business metrics.

DESIGN IMPACT

Integrate

Rapid prototyping as part of the design process by coordinating quick feedback from the customers.

BUSINESS IMPACT

6%

More monthly donations.

12%

More fees coverage

MY ROLE

User Testing, Interaction Design, Journey Maps, Task Analysis, Google Analytics, LogRocket analysis, Mixpanel.

CONTEXT

As part of my role in Givingloop as Sr UX Designer.

TEAM

x1 Business Analyst. x2 PMs. x1 UI Designer.

PLATFORM

Web and Mobile responsive

ASH SAMHOURI

CEO and Founder of Givingloop

When Rafat says UX he really means it.

Rafat is full of options and very explorative, he offers solutions to problems and is very flexible to discuss UX ideas with, he can see the different perspectives of the stakeholders and therefore come up with ideas that work. I loved working with Rafat and I recommend him for your UX projects.

ASH SAMHOURI

CEO and Founder of Gicingloop

When Rafat says UX he really means it.

Rafat is full of options and very explorative, he offers solutions to problems and is very flexible to discuss UX ideas with, he can see the different perspectives of the stakeholders and therefore come up with ideas that work. I loved working with Rafat and I recommend him for your UX projects.

PROBLEM

Only 6% of donors convert from One-Time donations to Monthly recuiring ones.

Givingloop aimed to build sustainable monthly donations as a key revenue stream and market strategy. However, the existing donation flow lacked engagement, impacting revenue and user retention, making it crucial to optimize the experience

SOLUTION

Exploring toggle with a joyful touch

I designed the Heart-Tree metaphor to symbolize growth, joy, and sustainability, enhancing the donation experience. Thoughtful micro-interactions further elevated the user experience, making it more engaging and memorable.

ITERATE

Reduce default monthly amounts to encourage users to switch

Rather than asking users to switch entirely to a monthly donation, I proposed adding an optional $1 per month on top of their one-time donation. This approach was supported by impactful messaging and emotional copy that clearly communicated the value of even a small recurring contribution.

ETHICAL DESIGN

Promoting Transparency in the Donation Experience

The "Cover Fees" option gave users the choice to pay the transaction fees so their full donation could go to the cause. However, the checkbox was automatically pre-selected, which didn’t feel entirely fair. I advocated for a more honest and transparent approach, leaving the box unchecked and allowing users to decide for themselves. This small change helped build trust and made the donation experience feel more respectful.

FINAL TOUCHES

Streamlined UI Design Focused on Clarity

The donation experience underwent several major redesigns at both the experience and interface levels. I streamlined the flow by removing unnecessary elements and reducing large illustrations that didn’t add significant value, creating a cleaner and more focused user journey.


Ideation

Deciding on the main design and placement of the AI agent. We know the agent should live in the employer dashboard, but where and how to introduce it?

Pros  ✅

-  Positioned above the fold for maximum visibility and quick access.

- Chat interface is collapsible, giving users control over their experience without disrupting workflow.

- The AI Agent is prominently featured, encouraging immediate interaction.

Cons ❌

- The upgrade button lacks visibility, making it hard for users to discover when and how to upgrade.

- There's no dedicated space to showcase plan benefits or highlight the value of additional tools

Pros  ✅

- Clearly introduces SimplyInsured’s marketing message, reinforcing brand value.

- Provides screen space to display default prompts, improving discoverability and engagement.

- Chat can be minimized to a compact widget in the bottom-right corner, maintaining a clean interface without losing access.

- Users can notice other tools and see what SI has to offer beside the Ai Agent.

Cons ❌

- Displaying the chat in an overlay above the main interface can distract users and pull focus away from the tools already on screen.

- When minimized, the chat widget overlaps with the Help section, creating potential confusion or accessibility issues.

Pros  ✅

- Compact layout takes up minimal space, keeping the interface clean and focused.

- Sets clear expectations for users by presenting the chat in a familiar, contained format.

- Upgrade button is clearly visible, making the next step obvious.

- Positioned above the fold for immediate visibility and access.

- Default prompts are easy to see, guiding users to engage with the assistant quickly.

Cons ❌

- Users aren’t made aware of all available SimplyInsured plan tiers, including the free version—limiting transparency and comparison at a glance.

Smart Personalization via Employee Selection

To deliver plan-specific answers, we introduced a dropdown to select an employee.

Smart Personalization via Employee Selection - The flow

Once an employee is selected.

- All answers were dynamically customized to that employee’s insurance plan
- A visual callout appeared in the chat header confirming the selection
- The chat icon subtly changed to reflect the employee context
- Users could clear selection anytime to return to general Q&A

This allowed us to support multiple use cases—answering for a specific employee or exploring general benefit details.

Ideation

I explored multiple concepts, carefully weighing the pros and cons of each before deciding on the final direction.

Pros  ✅

- Saves vertical space, allowing more cards to be visible at once without scrolling.

- Displays key information at a glance, helping users quickly scan options.

Cons ❌

- Feels overly dense and visually crowded.

- Expansion behavior is unintuitive, leading to a clunky experience.

- Adds cognitive load, making it harder for users to process information easily.

Pros  ✅

- Saves vertical space, allowing more cards to be visible at once without scrolling

- Cleaner card with more room to breathe

Cons ❌

- Lacks immediate access to key actions like “Get Started” and “View Plan Details”

- Requires additional clicks to access important information

- May reduce user momentum and increase drop-off in the flow

Pros  ✅

- Add rating for the insurance carrier which helps in making decisions

- Displays key information at a glance, helping users quickly scan options

Cons ❌

- Some information may appear repetitive or redundant

- Slight increase in vertical spacing, reducing the number of visible cards above the fold

Solution

By combining the strengths of each concept, balancing priorities through red route analysis, and aligning with user expectations, we selected a fourth concept as the final direction.

Allow expansion so the user can read more details that are important for making choices.

Card highlights appear on hover, and if the user is interested, clicking expands the top section accordingly. The new favorite feature was placed neatly on the right corner.

The highlight area and favorite feature disappear only when the user clicks 'Compare'—a deliberate decision to direct focus toward the comparison action. To reinforce this, the top section is styled with a distinct color, and a bottom sticky nav appears, with the same color, showing the compared plans.

Results

- Immediate Conversion Rate: The new card design achieved a 6.19% conversion rate, up from 4.87% with the previous design.

- User Flow Engagement: The new design showed higher completion rates at key steps like 'Viewed Company Application' and 'Application Signed,' reflecting a smoother and more effective user experience.

Other re designed features

Tables are a core element of our product, appearing across the platform in various sizes, formats, and with different actions. This made it essential to account for them carefully within the design system.

Other re designed features

The FAQ section was redesigned and tested through A/B/C testing. The design system played a vital role in guiding decisions for the new component. Full project details are shared in a separate case study.

You may check a more detailed case study version of this project

Here